- No provider option for openlca full#
- No provider option for openlca software#
These incomplete LCA analyses, lacking cradle-to-grave impacts, can distort the full picture of these unintended impacts from the global energy transition. However, the literature primarily focuses on GHG emissions during operations, often ignoring other environmental impacts that occur during operations and especially within the international upstream supply chains. These LCAs track potential environmental impacts along the supply chain of these technologies. The literature on this transition includes life cycle analyses (LCAs) conducted on various electricity generation technologies, such as natural gas combined cycle gas turbines, wind turbines, and solar panels, as well as electricity storage technologies (batteries). Demand for minerals such as lithium, graphite, cobalt, copper, rare earths, and nickel, which are necessary for manufacturing wind, solar, and battery equipment, is expected to grow 7 to 40 times between 20 ( IEA, 2021). However, a societal shift in electricity generating technologies is extremely complex at global scale, involving a number of uncertainties that need to be addressed to avoid negative unintended consequences. Globally, the energy transition away from greenhouse gas (GHG)–intense, carbon-based fuels and toward more sustainable and renewable energy is generally accepted as a means to mitigate impacts of climate change.
What is the specific problem this research addresses?
Texas Consortium for Computational Seismology (TCCS). State of Texas Advanced Resource Recovery (STARR). Reservoir Characterization Research Laboratory (RCRL). Mudrock Systems Research Laboratory (MSRL). 
Fracture Research and Application Consortium (FRAC). Center for Integrated Seismicity Research (CISR). Geological Sequestration of Greenhouse Gases. They have a corresponding website where users can review source documentation and additional information. No provider option for openlca software#
They are able to be directly used by inventory developers (databases that require companies to also purchase consulting services or specific software tools to access them are not included in the list). The databases included below meet the following criteria: Data should also be evaluated using the data quality indicators described in the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (chapter 7) and the Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard (chapter 8) and selecting the highest quality data available in the context of business objectives and the principles of relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy. For example, a database may contain combustion-only emission factors that are not applicable to product life cycle GHG inventories. Before using a database, its documentation should be reviewed for transparency, completeness, and applicability to the GHG inventory for which the data is being collected. Some of the data in these sources may not be consistent with certain GHG Protocol standards. The list is not exhaustive and the inclusion of a database in this list does not constitute an endorsement by the GHG Protocol. This list of available third party databases assists users in collecting data for product life cycle and corporate value chain (scope 3) GHG inventories.Ī summary of each source - including data formats, accessibility, content, and transparency information - is available by clicking on the database link.
0 kommentar(er)
